文献存在非常严重的问题:把不是BFO的材料测量结果指鹿为马,不建议阅读。
这篇文献存在非常严重的问题:把不是BFO的材料测量结果指鹿为马,不建议阅读。
下面是我给作者的通信原文,同时我写书信寄到波兰,但至今没有收到回复。
"i just read your paper about BFO dielectric properties documented in Fig5A from Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 154, 191-4(2008). Unfortunately, from Fig5A i cannot read dielectric constant below 900K, and the other point is the presented data was @ 20kHz which is not as good as that from 1 MHz, so would you like send me the origin raw data for this measurement?
Besides, when comparing dielectric constant data of O15, Fig5B from Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 154, 187-90(2008) as well as Fig2(DTA data), from that of BFO, to my surprise, they are almost the same. Are you sure there is no mistake when you presented the data from original measurements."
|