Rethinking Calcium: Bone Health or Heartache?

[复制链接]
查看: 1431|回复: 4
发表于 2010-11-15 20:31:38 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Sandra A. Fryhofer, MD
Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Past President, American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
This issue of "Staying Well" focuses on rethinking calcium recommendations. In the past, calcium concerns have focused on bone health and on how to get enough calcium. Adequate calcium intake recommendations developed by the Food and Nutrition Board at the Institute of Medicine say that children and teens 18 years of age or younger need 1300 mg daily, and adult men and women 19 to 50 years of age need 1000 mg daily. After age 50 years, the Institute of Medicine recommends even more calcium, and daily adequate intake increases to 1200 mg.[1,2] Now, a study in BMJ raises concern that supplemental calcium may have an inadvertent adverse outcome: It could hurt your heart.[3]
Calcium and Heart Woes

In this meta-analysis of 15 randomized blinded placebo-controlled trials. Dr. Mark Bolland from the University of Auckland in New Zealand and colleagues evaluated calcium supplement use (at least 500 mg daily) in more than 12,000 patients older than 40 years of age. The findings were surprising: The pooled results linked calcium supplement intake to a significant 30% increased risk for heart attack. A tendency to increased risk for stroke and sudden death was also seen, but this result was not significant. Of note, cardiovascular outcomes were not a primary endpoint in any of the individual trials. Proposed mechanisms for the higher risk include increased blood coagulability and decreased blood vessel compliance due to calcium buildup in the arterial wall. On the basis of these findings, the authors postulate that treating 1000 people with calcium for 5 years would prevent 26 fractures but cause an additional 14 heart attacks.[3]
This is not the first time that Dr. Bolland has studied calcium intake and cardiovascular outcomes. Two years ago, results of a randomized placebo-controlled study of 1471 postmenopausal women were published that linked calcium supplements with greater cardiovascular risk.[4] That 2008 study by Bolland and colleagues was included in their 2010 meta-analysis.
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-15 20:37:44 | 显示全部楼层
相关文献:
正方:http://www.xinkexue.com/bib.php?do=ref&refid=18790
反方:http://www.xinkexue.com/bib.php?do=ref&refid=18789[本话题由 Dr.LinZhen 于 2010-11-15 20:42:47 编辑]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-11-15 22:32:12 | 显示全部楼层
这个课题其实很有意思。我们实验室如果有兴趣的话,可以做一些相关的研究。我想于ZF是有兴趣的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-11-16 14:20:55 | 显示全部楼层
Anyone intersted in this, pls refer to all the comments.
http://www.xinkexue.com/bib-ref-uid-3419-refid-18789.html
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-16 15:07:06 | 显示全部楼层
So here are the questions raised from current debate:
1.The major criticism to the paper is that most of the evidences included are non-published cases, more clinical evidences should be collected.  
2.Whether vitamin D is associated with higher risk of heartache when taking calcium supplement?  
3. If calcium does increase adverse heart events, what is the potential mechanism?[本话题由 Dr.LinZhen 于 2010-11-16 15:09:15 编辑]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

精彩图文
Copyright;  © 新科学想法 2016-2017   浙公网安备 33010202000686号   ( 浙ICP备09035230号-1 )