新科学想法 学术文库 学术文献 浏览文献

有读书笔记Evaluation of affinity-based genome-wide DNA methylation data: Effects of CpG density, amplification bias, and copy number variation

tlexander 添加于 2010-11-14 23:57 | 1378 次阅读 | 0 个评论
  •  作 者

    Robinson MD, Stirzaker C, Statham AL, Coolen MW, Song JZ, Nair SS, Strbenac D, Speed TP, Clark SJ
  •  摘 要

    DNA methylation is an essential epigenetic modification that plays a key role associated with the regulation of gene expression during differentiation, but in disease states such as cancer, the DNA methylation landscape is often deregulated. There are now numerous technologies available to interrogate the DNA methylation status of CpG sites in a targeted or genome-wide fashion, but each method, due to intrinsic biases, potentially interrogates different fractions of the genome. In this study, we compare the affinity-purification of methylated DNA between two popular genome-wide techniques, methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) and methyl-CpG binding domain-based capture (MBDCap). and show that each technique operates in a different domain of the CpG density landscape. We explored the effect of whole-genome amplification and illustrate that it can reduce sensitivity for detecting DNA methylation in GC-rich regions of the genome. By using MBDCap, we compare and contrast microarray- and sequencing-based readouts and highlight the impact that copy number variation (CNV) can make in differential comparisons of methylomes. These studies reveal that the analysis of DNA methylation data and genome coverage is highly dependent on the method employed, and consideration must be made in light of the GC content, the extent of DNA amplification, and the copy number.
  •  详细资料

    • 文献种类: Journal Article
    • 期刊名称: Genome Research
    • 期刊缩写: Genome Res
    • 期卷页: 2010
    • 地址: Epigenetics Laboratory, Cancer Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney 2010, New South Wales, Australia
    • ISBN: 1088-9051
    • 备注:PMID:21045081
  • 学科领域 生物医药 » 基础医学

  • 相关链接 DOI URL 

  •  tlexander 的文献笔记  订阅

    方法决定结果

    继深圳华大李宁的那篇文章method文章之后,越来越多的证据标明,不同的Methylome分析方法,MeDIP,MBDcap等在Methylome分析中存在差异性,这种差异性与基因组的CPG密度,基因拷贝数,gene deletion 相关。

    其他的文献还有:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20852635?dopt=Citation

管理选项: 导出文献|

评论(0 人)

facelist doodle 涂鸦板

Copyright;  © 新科学想法 2016-2017   浙公网安备 33010202000686号   ( 浙ICP备09035230号-1 )